Bad Eagle.com is the first website for American Indian Patriots, and the only voice of conservative American Indian thought. Dr. David A. Yeagley, direct descendent of the Comanche warrior Bad Eagle (1839-1906), is the first conservative American Indian in the American media. Through Bad Eagle.com all conservative Indians are invited to join their voices in honor of Indian warriors in the cause of American Patriotism.
The stats showed that the large Negro population of North Carolina voted for Barak Hussein Obama. (The 2000 census put the black population at 22.1% of the state's total population.) The Hussein Campaign also garnered a great deal of the new, younger, first time voters, obviously youngsters who have experienced coerced integration from day-care days through high school and college. They feel voting for Obama validates their own otherwise uncomfortable experience.
So, how did this same state elect Bev Perdue as Lieutenant Governor in 2000? In 1987, she was one of the two Democrats who voted against a state bill ( HB 726) which allowed more rigorous investigation into hate crimes--without local request. Some of her opponents, particularly gubenatorial candidate Richard Moore, imply that Perdue therefore is supportive of the Ku Klux Klan.
Lt. Gov. of North Carolina, Bev Perdue
In other words, Bev Perdue (now running for governor of the state), a white women, a Democrat, can get elected Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina, but, Hillary Clinton, also a white woman Democrat, cannot get the nomination for Democrat presidential candidate in the same state. This seems a bit of an anomaly. Did Hillary need to join then the KKK? Would that have helped? Is that what Hillary lacked?
Well, seriously, there is a something to say about association here. Republican Ron Paul has seemingly so many strange and marginal assocations (via supporters), including KKK members, that it is difficult to understand his campaign. Contributors, anxious to influence the election, can become liabilities to the candidate. (Bev Perdue just returned contributions from alcohol industries for that very reason. I wonder if the Klan ever contributed to her campaign.)
Now, patriotic state that North Carolina has been, how could they support someone like Barak Hussein Obama?--who has the most anti-American associations of all, including Muslims, Marxists, and manic baby killers. This is indeed a mystery. Perhaps it is the ignorance and emotionalism of youth, (a specialty of the Hussein Campaign), or the social self-purging of white liberals in North Carolina (many of whom are no doubt "immigrants" from New York, (or trespaasser from Mexico; the "hispanic" populations of North Carolina is by far the fastest growing minority there).
The media would certainly have us believe that the demographics of America have forever changed, drastically, in the last 20 years. The media would have us believe that it's all about diversity. Whites are passe. The cool thing is color. Hussein is in like flint, so to speak. Youth live in media. They obviously think like the media has trained them to think. The media is liberal, and set against anything traditional or "status quo" about America, and that includes the white race. America must become a dark race now. A colored race. A non-white race. That's the whole effort here.
I've said before, American Indians should be the first to dread such a move. The ascent of the darkie onto the great white throne of America will bring no blessing to the American Indian. Indeed, unless it is an Savage in the White House, Indians will be humilated beyond calculation. A marginal Negro like B. Hussein O. bespeaks a profound schizophrenia in the whole country. The associations of Obama are entirely averse to all American history and ethos. He could not bring himself to speak of American Indians in his infamous racist speech, (only mentioning "native American children" once, in one sentence, along with Asian and Hispanic children). To Obama, American Indians do not exist. Indians are not part of the fabric of American politics. He knows nothing, absolutely nothing about America Indians, or American Indian history.
The political behavior of North Carolina is therefore of great concern. BadEagle.com just finished a month of blogs on Confederate History (April, 2008). And now we observe the strange and unaccountable "voting" behavior of a Southern state--not the deep South, true, but one certainly a big part of the Confederacy. Can this behavior be an indicator of the future of the American public? Has the liberal media been this successful?
Rush Limbaugh, radio host.
And one more thing. Rush Limbaugh is being "accused" of influencing the election with his "Operation Chaos"--his effort to keep the Dems fighting over Obama and Hillary--through supporting Hillary. (By the way, that was Ann Coulter's idea.) This is a typical piece of liberal hypocrisy. The campaign efforts themselves are designed to influence the election! That's the whole point. Contributors are influencial, because they give money. However, the media can get a handle on the money issue. Why, that's unfair and undemocratic. Why, you can't buy an election. But the liberal media can't get a handle on Rush Limbaugh. Radio. Free speech. Mass communication. Accusing Limbaugh just isn't going to work, is it? It's okay for Obama's campaign to "influence" young, immature, inexperienced, and uninformed voters in North Carlina; but it's not okay for a radio talk show host to influence anyone. If he were a professional campaign worker, maybe. But just a free speaker. Can't have that.
A Victim of Beggars Abuse of the Conscience By David Yeagley
Beggars have no fear. They also have nothing to lose. That is why they offend the soul. The beggar puts his victim on edge, as if the judgment of the Almighty awaited the victim’s response to the beggar.
I never knew what street beggars were all about until I moved to New Haven, Connecticut (to attend Yale Divinity, of all places). The politically correct names for them had already developed, like “homeless,” “dependent,” or “mentally challenged.” My old Italian barber, D’Eugenio said, “In my day, we called ‘em bums.” The older term was “hobo.”
There’s an aspect of adventure associated with the vagrant, or transient. Children pick up on it. The Andy Griffith Show once featured a story about little Opie and a beggar. It was called “Opie’s Hobo Friend,” (aired November 13, 1961). It starred Buddy Ebsen as the bum.
Opie Taylor (Ron Howard)
Turns out the bum is vice-ridden, addicted to habits of homelessness, the dependency, and worst of all, to the abuse of human charity. The bum learns early on how to live off the good nature of the stranger. To the slave of vice, it is especially the stranger who offers the best chance of a new take.
Sheriff Taylor (Any Griffith) who had to set little Opie straight on the true condition of the beggar.
As I observed this social phenomenon in New Haven, a town full of mentally “ill” people—with all sorts of experimental psychiatrists and psychologists (like the infamous liberal Dr. Benjamin Spock, first to advocate that spanking children was wrong), I grew averse to beggars. I even wrote a couple of short stories about my frustrations, in a collection called Tales of the Road.
I’m still in conflict. Certainly, the beggar is a perennial parable. He is always there. He is enshrined in the lessons of our Lord. We’ve all met Lazarus—regardless of the size of our bank account. He is some archetype of the conscience, some messenger of meaning.
We are offended because he intrudes—with divine sanction, it seems. Even if he is a total abuser, of himself and of humanity, he still plays the archetype. He is still hard to resist. Even in a day when we seemed taxed into poverty ourselves—to take care of the likes of him, still, his personal appeal, on the street corner, on the highway off-ramps, in a store, on the sidewalk, is like a haunting presence of something larger, grander than ourselves.
Some people act like they have no problem ignoring him. Others are piquantly perturbed. Anyone with half a conscience enjoys being a “good Samaritan.” Refusing the beggar insults Jesus.
In a way, the persistent presence of the homeless beggar is a powerful testimony to the failure of every government program to relieve human poverty. There is no moral principle in government programs, save in the sell to legislators. The program itself contains no remedy for the “sinner.” Government programs are failed maintenance programs.
But, as long as we’re talking about coerced charity, or forced social maintenance, the logical solution is something that is rarely mentioned: sterilization. The “dependent” population multiplies itself much more so than the independent population. Dependency is the thing that is multiplying. Therefore, reduction of dependency obviously requires reduction of reproduction.
Liberals might call that a Nazi notion, or even genetic engineering (—though they love to kill babies). But this is rather false. Every principle of nature points to natural selection. No force in nature is designed to promote weakness and dependency. No plant or animal that is not independent can possibly survive. But, some people think that sanctioning, yea, promoting dependency, aimless reproduction of misery, and slavish abuse, is righteousness.
How could such a distortion of reality ever become a government policy?!
American Indians have a stake in this business of beggary. Of course, a “homeless” Indian is psychologically incomparable to other homeless. (How can you be homeless when you’re walking on your own land? Many Indians are not at all averse to the stars. Life outdoors is natural.) Indians today have inherited the land bought with blood. The treaties were a con, though. The treaties said the government would take care of us—if we quite killing white people, if we surrendered our honor and our land. Treaty provisions are not welfare in principle.
The proudest “beggar,” therefore, is the American Indian. Making those treaties work is what it means to be Indian! And the average Indian is not really materialistic. Poverty can bring one close to the earth. There is a similarity between poverty and the old days of Indian life.
and the only voice of conservative American Indian thought. Dr. David A. Yeagley, direct descendent of the Comanche warrior Bad Eagle (1839-1906), is the first conservative American Indian in the American media. Through Bad Eagle.com all conservative Indians are invited to join their voices in honor of Indian warriors in the cause of American Patriotism. 
